Most schools evaluating behaviour and wellbeing software end up with a pile of sales decks that all sound alike – "engagement," "insights," "seamless." What actually separates the platforms is how they perform against a handful of concrete questions. This guide sets those questions out, so you can score any product against the same framework, on a like-for-like basis.
Screenshot this list, or copy it into a spreadsheet with a column per platform you're considering – it works as a scorecard as much as a read.
1. Behaviour recognition
How quickly can a teacher recognise good behaviour in the moment – a single tap, or a form to fill in later? Does recognition connect to the values or House system your school already runs, so praise means the same thing in every classroom? And when something more serious happens, can it be recorded properly without the positive side of the system getting lost underneath it?
2. Wellbeing & student voice
Is wellbeing a first-class part of the platform, or a module bolted onto a behaviour tool (or vice versa)? Look for genuine check-ins and journals, not just an annual survey; alerts that route to the right member of staff automatically; and self-regulation tools students can reach for themselves, not only ones staff initiate.
3. Whole-school insights
A single incident or a single low mood entry rarely tells a leader much. Can the platform show the pattern underneath – live dashboards, trends across a term, and evidence you could actually put in front of an inspector – rather than raw logs someone has to interpret by hand?
4. Family & community engagement
How does good news travel? Some platforms focus on parent messaging and photo feeds; others focus on displays and celebration inside the building. Think about which culture you want to build, and whether the platform’s family-facing side adds to staff workload or removes it.
5. Student experience
Software that only works for a Reception classroom, or only for Year 11, will fight your school’s structure. Check age-appropriateness across key stages, whether the experience holds up for secondary as well as primary, and whether gamification (avatars, badges, quests) is used with a purpose rather than for its own sake.
6. Setup & data integration
Ask specifically: does it sync with your MIS (Wonde, SIMS, Arbor, Bromcom…) or is student/staff data entered by hand? How long does onboarding realistically take, and is there a person helping you through it? A platform that takes a term to set up rarely gets used well in year one.
7. Safeguarding & data privacy
This should never be an afterthought. Ask directly: is the vendor UK GDPR compliant and ICO-registered? Where is data hosted? Is there a Data Processing Agreement available before you sign anything? How are safeguarding alerts routed, and to whom?
8. Pricing & value
Transparent, public pricing is rarer than it should be in this sector – plenty of platforms are quote-only, which makes budgeting and comparison harder than it needs to be. Look for a clear per-student cost, understand what’s gated behind higher tiers, and check whether core features (like MIS integration) are included or charged separately.
Using this framework
None of these eight criteria matter equally to every school – a large secondary weighing up inspection evidence will read "whole-school insights" differently to a primary school focused on early wellbeing intervention. Rank the eight for your own context first, then score your shortlist against them in that order.
We use this exact framework to score Ten Points against the alternatives schools consider most often – including where another platform genuinely wins. Read the head-to-heads below, or book a call if you'd rather talk it through.
Compare Ten Points to specific platforms
Looking for a Class Charts alternative?
A comparison of Class Charts and Ten Points – where Class Charts wins on breadth and seating plans, and where Ten Points wins on wellbeing and transparent pricing.
CompareLooking for a ClassDojo alternative?
A comparison of ClassDojo and Ten Points – where ClassDojo wins on free parent communication, and where Ten Points wins on data ownership: one connected, school-owned dataset synced to your MIS.
CompareLooking for an ePraise alternative?
A comparison of ePraise and Ten Points – where ePraise wins on breadth (homework, parents' evenings) and where Ten Points wins on a modern, wellbeing-first student experience and transparent pricing.
CompareLooking for a youHQ alternative?
A comparison of youHQ and Ten Points – where youHQ wins on wellbeing depth and staff wellbeing, and where Ten Points wins by bringing behaviour and wellbeing into one platform.
CompareLooking for a YouHue alternative?
A comparison of YouHue and Ten Points – where YouHue wins on a lightweight, focused emotion check-in tool, and where Ten Points wins by adding behaviour, Houses and whole-school insight on top.